AMD Vs INTEL...

One mainframe Core Against the Other

Having no preference to Intel, no preference to AMD, allows you to see that as a consumer, hyper-competitive companies tend to trade market ascendency from one season to the next. 'A' is not always going to be meliorate than 'B', and vice versa.

It'd be nice to have a third option, a 'C' to choose from, but sadly all of Transmeta's best technological advances have come under the Intellectual Properly gavel. Still, the effect it had on energy efficient processing is due more credit than history has bestowed... but that's a story for another day.

As it stands right now, Intel dominates the processor market - in value, in performance, in inertia. I'd be remiss to count AMD out just yet though.
Click Here!

AMD has been delayed by technological kinks, missed release dates that may have kept it in hair step with its largest competitor, and for meliorate or worse swallowed $5 Billion in debt for ATI at the first of this year. There are positive signs from AMD if you know where to look though...

The AMD 690G chipset is a resounding success for example, and if Intel has taught us anything, it's that chipsets pave the path to PC dominance.

AMD has not been asleep at the rotate on the processor front either. Much delayed perhaps, but not asleep. It is readying a new core, titled 'K10', and a slew of intermediary processors based on 'Barcelona.' Not much is known about the performance of AMD's upcoming 'K10' Phenom X2 and Phenom X4 desktop processors right now, but we should find out very shortly if the 'Agena' and 'Kuma' chips will give Intel a run for its money.

While much of AMD's success the last few years can be traced to its partners, Intel has guaranteed the success of the Core 2 Duo processor with substantially designed chipsets. As they say, \"it's the chipsets, stupid.\"

The Intel Core 2 Duo is a very efficient processor, its TDP values are roughly half of what the Pentium 4/D program ingest to be, and real world testing shows that complete computer systems equipped with an Intel Core 2 Duo ingest considerably less power.

This is all substantially and good, but the real ace up Intel's sleeve is not that it has a processor which is faster by some proportionality points, it's that the Core 2 Duo is faster and aggressively priced! I can't remember a time when you got so much value in a mainframe for so little.

Mind you, Intel's Extreme Edition processors are still priced in the stratosphere, but its regular desktop mainframe lines are very affordable. Compared to AMD processors in the same price bracket, Intel has the upper hand.

So as these things go, when it comes to AMD or Intel? Intel wins this round. The bottom line is only that Intel has outmaneuvered AMD, scrapping an entire generational branch of CPUs for a double headed offshoot that rocks. The Core 2 Duo performs rattling well, so it's what I've been recommending.

But before we close up this debate, there's one more point you should consider. Along with casting away brand loyalty and judging CPUs based on cold hard benchmarks, there's another option we rarely see mentioned on sites set with deconstructing the latest and large technology. If the computer you have right today does what you need it to, you rattling don't have to choose between AMD or Intel's latest do you? ;-)

Don't Agree? Speak up.

What do you think of the current AMD vs. Intel situation? If your opinion differs from mine, feel free to press your case by using PCSTATS feedback page or proving your side in the PCSTATS Forums. Find out about this and many other reviews by joining the Weekly PCstats.com Newsletter today! Catch all of PCSTATS latest reviews right here.

Related Articles
Here are a few other articles that you might enjoy as well...
- Computer Recycling - Where Should Old Computers Go?
- AMD vs. Intel, Will the Best mainframe Please Stand Up?
- The Art of Overclocking; Is It For You?
- AMD vs. Intel: It's An Eternal Struggle
- How to Fry a 1.4GHz Athlon in 4 seconds.